Bug 504810
| Summary: | F11 libvirt managed machine stops at GRUB if virtio and IDE disk mix | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | erikj |
| Component: | qemu | Assignee: | Glauber Costa <gcosta> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 11 | CC: | dwmw2, gcosta, itamar, markmc, virt-maint |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-06-22 12:43:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
erikj
2009-06-09 15:11:25 UTC
Host pkg levels, meant to include this: # rpm -q kernel qemu-kvm libvirt virt-manager kernel-2.6.29.1-102.fc11.x86_64 kernel-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 qemu-kvm-0.10.4-4.fc11.x86_64 libvirt-0.6.2-11.fc11.x86_64 virt-manager-0.7.0-5.fc11.x86_64 Every virtio disk that aims to be bootable has to include the boot=on flag. Maybe danpb can say more about why it is not happening here? Erik: could you attach the libvirt XML config for the guest that gives the original command line you posted? We only set boot=on for the first disk, so I suspect you just need to re-order to drivers in the guest XML? I'm keeping NODEINFO (today was all meetings... will try to get to this next week). My point is just that I used the tools to manage the guest and it resulted, in this situation, in a guest that wouldn't boot. I already know that adjusting the qemu-kvm command line makes it work. I'll do the test from comment #3 soon. thanks. (In reply to comment #5) > My point is just that I used the tools to manage the guest and it resulted, > in this situation, in a guest that wouldn't boot. Please give us a detailed set of steps to reproduce, then - somehow you ended up with a non-bootable disk as your first drive, which seems odd. Oh, a virt-manager.log excerpt showing the steps taken would be useful too Okay, had simple a reproducer *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 507271 *** |