Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||NEW ---||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||anto.trande, bloch, c.david86, dominik, e, fedora-package-review, henriquecsj, jamatos, jonathan.underwood, josephsmidt, kryzhev, mail, mycae, orion, rdieter, richardfearn, seb, soerenmoeller2001, zbyszek|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:||957715, 1120982, 1134835, 1176593, 1424482, 721112, 865371, 1398400, 1419366, 1419379, 1505108, 1506949, 1506986|
Description Susi Lehtola 2009-06-10 16:20:46 EDT
This is a tracker bug for Fedora Science and Technology related packages used instead of the wiki.
Comment 1 Susi Lehtola 2009-06-10 16:22:52 EDT
Adding existing trackers from the SciTech SIG page.
Comment 2 Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-10 17:17:51 EDT
Can I use this tracker for Electronic engineering apps as well ? (FEL related)
Comment 3 Susi Lehtola 2009-06-10 17:26:10 EDT
(In reply to comment #2) > Can I use this tracker for Electronic engineering apps as well ? (FEL related) Engineering is Technology, isn't it? :) Sure thing, everything that is related to science or technology should be tracked here (till the review has been accepted that is, I'm hoping people will be more active than in FE-NEEDSPONSOR which had umphty obsolete blockers). Less hassle in updating the wiki pages this way.
Comment 4 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-28 17:14:11 EDT
Scilab (Bug 472639) is blocked by two dependencies: JOGL and Gluegen, both waiting review. If someone could take a look, maybe we can go ahead with scilab. -- gluegen - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572512 jogl - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515
Comment 5 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-02-07 00:22:47 EST
What's the point of this removal? This bug works (worked) as an easy way to find various scientific reviews, what remains to be done, and what was already finished or aborted.