Bug 506651

Summary:	un-relevant packages in the Snapshot's Packages sub-tab
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component:	Provisioning	Assignee:	Pradeep Kilambi <pkilambi>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	530	CC:	cperry
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-06-19 15:16:40 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Hutař 2009-06-18 05:52:59 UTC

Description of problem:
I see there completely un-relevant packages (among with relevant "aide") on the Snapshot's Packages sub-tab (On the snapshot's detail page I see correct "Package Manifest: 1 change" - so the summary is OK).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite-5.3.0-RHEL5-re20090612.0-x86_64


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
  1. Enable Provisioning
  2. `rhn-profile-sync` and tag last snapshot
  3. Install "aide" through WebUI and `rhn_check`
  4. Ensure "aide" was installed with `rpm -q aide`
  5. Provisioning > Snapshots > tagged snapshot > Packages sub-tab


Actual results:
Package Current Version  Snapshot Version Difference
aide  0.13.1-2.0.4.el5  -   Current profile only 
curl  7.15.5-2.el5   7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.4  Snapshot newer 
file  4.17-15   4.17-15.el5_3.1  Snapshot newer 
pango  1.14.9-3.el5   1.14.9-5.el5_3   Snapshot newer


Expected results:
Package Current Version  Snapshot Version Difference
aide  0.13.1-2.0.4.el5  -   Current profile only


Additional info:
Sorry, I'm not able to reproduce this any more. Could the relevant code be slightly checked as I have seen this 2 or 3 times yesterday?

Comment 1 Brandon Perkins 2009-06-18 14:50:07 UTC

Prad, can you take a look at this and see if there is anything obvious before we approve or deny this bug.