Bug 507501
Summary: | Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jim Radford <radford> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jim Radford <radford> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, fonts-bugs, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | nicolas.mailhot:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 20070624-3.fc11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-06-30 21:31:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jim Radford
2009-06-23 02:02:25 UTC
Quick review: 1. The licensing code for OFL, is OFL, not SIL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#Approved_font_licenses W: invalid-license SIL 2. Please do not rename the ttf, it makes cross-distro checks easier when everyone is using the unmodified upstream filename 3. I don't think you win a lot by creating the fontconfig file dynamically instead of putting it as Source1. So I'd advise against it. But I won't block the review on this 4. Please use a leading capital A in the summary inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized a clean and usable latin fantasy font 5. Please correct the documentation end of lines inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/OFL.txt inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/FONTLOG.txt 6. Please correct the documentation encoding file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/FONTLOG.txt You have examples of encoding and EOL fixup in the andika spec http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/sil-andika-fonts/sil-andika-fonts.spec (of course you need to adapt the source encoding passed to iconv to your file) Apart from that, the spec seems clean and fine (In reply to comment #1) > 1. The licensing code for OFL, is OFL, not SIL Fixed. > 2. Please do not rename the ttf, it makes cross-distro checks easier when > everyone is using the unmodified upstream filename Ok. Fixed. > 3. I don't think you win a lot by creating the fontconfig file dynamically > instead of putting it as Source1. So I'd advise against it. But I won't block > the review on this It's simpler for me to have a single file, so I'll leave that as is. > 4. Please use a leading capital A in the summary Fixed. > 5. Please correct the documentation end of lines Fixed. > 6. Please correct the documentation encoding Fixed. > Apart from that, the spec seems clean and fine Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts-20070624-2.fc11.src.rpm 1. For multiarch packages you'll find out it's better not to change the timestamp of txt files during encoding conversion (that's why the other spec had a touch). But for a noarch package, in %doc, I guess no one cares a lot 2. Please do include OFL-FAQ.txt as %doc too, even though OFL.txt is the main legal document the FAQ has some legal value. And it's not big I won't force another back-and-forth for 2. but do fix it before cvs import ☀☀☀ APPROVED ☀☀☀ The review is finished and you're now on you own to build, push and register your package everywhere it matters. Your next steps are documented on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! (In reply to comment #3) > 1. For multiarch packages you'll find out it's better not to change the > timestamp of txt files during encoding conversion (that's why the other spec > had a touch). But for a noarch package, in %doc, I guess no one cares a lot I agree it doesn't matter for noarch, but I preserved them anyway. > 2. Please do include OFL-FAQ.txt as %doc too, even though OFL.txt is the main > legal document the FAQ has some legal value. And it's not big I agree. Fixed. > Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! You're welcome. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: inkboy-fonts Short Description: A clean and usable latin fantasy font Owners: radford Branches: F-11 InitialCC: font-sig CVS done. inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging (In reply to comment #7) > BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging Thanks for the reminder. I was waiting for the package it be added to F11 or at least to hit the rawhide mirrors. inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |