Bug 50834
Summary: | E100 driver exhibits poor performance in IA64 systems | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Clay Cooper <clay_cooper> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | CC: | dale_kaisner, john_hull, matt_domsch, michael_e_brown, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ia64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-11-13 13:58:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Clay Cooper
2001-08-03 19:31:33 UTC
Bug reported to Intel (Walker, Timothy E [timothy.e.walker]) on 10 August 2001. Tim said he'd pass this on for investigation by the appropriate driver team. What is the e100 driver version? E100 version 1.6.5, in the beta3 IA64 kernel (2.4.6-3.1) 1) Would be interesting to know if eepro100 still dies on these systems 2) RC1 has a new version of the e100 driver that you can test E100 performance has not improved with kernel 2.4.9-0.18smp. Which I believe has e100 driver v1.6.22. I've asked that this be included in the Dell/RH/Intel 3-way call (which isn't on for this week after all). Does anyone know if Intel is actively working this issue? The problem here is swiommu performance -- the swiommu is a hack which doesn't actually perform very well at all. We are working on a patch which gives the same functionality as swiommu with much higher performance and our initial tests look very good, with some bugs still to be worked out. w/ qa1108 (2.4.9-13.3smp) e100 driven nics reporting speeds of 95MB/s sustained running nttcp. 95Mbit sustained sounds like fixed to me... |