Bug 508633

Summary: require enchant instead of aspell
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Component: xfce4-dictAssignee: Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: christoph.wickert
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.5.3-2.fc10 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-06-30 16:28:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
e.g. this patch to the spec none

Description Caolan McNamara 2009-06-29 09:18:52 UTC
Description of problem:
xfce4-dict actually prefers "enchant" over "aspell" if it is available, which is a good thing as it fits with the fedora policy for dictionaries (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary) and gives the same suggestions and language support as in OpenOffice.org/Firefox/Evolution etc.

So we should require enchant instead of aspell to reflect xfce4-dicts preference


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xfce4-dict-0.5.3.1

[caolan@Vain ~]$ strace -f xfce4-dict 2>&1 | grep usr\/bin
execve("/usr/bin/xfce4-dict", ["xfce4-dict"], [/* 42 vars */]) = 0
access("/usr/bin/bug-buddy", X_OK)      = 0
stat64("/usr/bin/bug-buddy", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=64624, ...}) = 0
access("/usr/bin/enchant", X_OK)        = 0
stat64("/usr/bin/enchant", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=13148, ...}) = 0
[pid 24625] execve("/usr/bin/enchant", ["/usr/bin/enchant", "-a", "-d", "en_IE"], [/* 42 vars */] <unfinished ...>

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2009-06-29 09:20:00 UTC
Created attachment 349759 [details]
e.g. this patch to the spec

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2009-06-30 16:28:25 UTC
took it upon myself to do this

Comment 3 Christoph Wickert 2009-06-30 17:34:37 UTC
Why? Was this a critical bug that needed to be fixed ASAP? Why only wait 28 hrs? I wasn't not even home from FUDCon when you filed the bug.

Proven packagers are allowed to touch others packages when there is an urgent need (secutity, bugs). This was not the case and therefor IMHO you misused your privileges.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-09-20 21:46:14 UTC
xfce4-dict-0.5.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-dict-0.5.3-2.fc11

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2009-09-20 21:49:12 UTC
xfce4-dict-0.5.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-dict-0.5.3-2.fc10

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 14:35:57 UTC
xfce4-dict-0.5.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 10:11:35 UTC
xfce4-dict-0.5.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.