Bug 508862
| Summary: | please update to 1.0.2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Nielsen <gnomeuser> |
| Component: | mono-nat | Assignee: | Paul Lange <palango> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | michel, palango |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 1.0.2-1.fc11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-09-19 00:12:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
David Nielsen
2009-06-30 10:16:51 UTC
That is for Mono.Nat, though, not MonoTorrent? Though to be honest, given the total lack of documentation (not even a README file -- seriously!) it is rather hard to tell which is which. the monotorrent developer does both, he announces new releases on the same blog. It's quite handy really. Right, but we package monotorrent, and not mono-nat, so how does this affect us? (Sorry if this is being obtuse, but upstream does not exactly make this clear. No public repository too, only snapshot tarballs.. euh) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/mono-nat/ <- Someone forgot to tell mono-nat that. I am the initial packager and maintainer of mono-nat for Fedora. Since I stepped down Paul Lange has kindly taken this low maintance package. There is a public repo as well, like many Mono related projects it lives in svn on mono-project.org: http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc/trunk/Mono.Nat/src/Mono.Nat/ Any other questions? Sorry for not replying faster, I'm just back from vacations. Do we need 1.0.2 in F11? 1.0.2 is already in rawhide and I only forgot to close this bug. I must be blind; sorry, for some reason I saw the monotorrent blog post and didn't notice that this is already assigned to mono-nat, not monotorrent As I understand it: A) newer monotorrent releases depend on this. B) it's a pure bugfix release with no compatibility problems. Given that I think it would serve our users best to have it available on every maintained Fedora release. The general policy on these matters tends to be to keep the same libraries and application versions available to all. It lessens the amount of code you have to support and gives our users the very latest bugfixes. It also gives upstream the assurance that users will not flood them with bugs already fixed which tends to make them happy. I would request that it be issued as an update and thank you Paul for putting this in Rawhide, I hope you had an enjoyable vacation. Please set the update to close this when it hits the repos. Michel, apology accepted. mono-nat-1.0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mono-nat-1.0.2-1.fc11 update is in the queue. One more question: do we have to rebuild monotorrent or monsoon? You shouldn't need to. mono-nat-1.0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mono-nat'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9688 mono-nat-1.0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |