Bug 509033
Summary: | No option to configure network | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tethys <sta040> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 11 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, rmaximo, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-07-28 01:47:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tethys
2009-06-30 23:01:09 UTC
This was a planned feature from back at Fedora 10: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features Specifically: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/NetConfigForNM Very definitely a bug. From the NetConfigForNM wiki page:
> Users should not notice a significant different with the way
> network configuration works during installation. Most of the
> changes are on the backend. Users will still be required to
> pick an interface to use and to fill in any required information
> such as WPA keys or static settings.
I wasn't given the option to enter any static network settings.
That meant that my network didn't work, so no NIS or NFS and I
was unable to log in, nor any way of entering the details, short
of logging in as root on a console and editing the appropriate
files under /etc/sysconfig. I thought you were trying to move
away from that...
(In reply to comment #2) > Very definitely a bug. From the NetConfigForNM wiki page: > > > Users should not notice a significant different with the way > > network configuration works during installation. Most of the > > changes are on the backend. Users will still be required to > > pick an interface to use and to fill in any required information > > such as WPA keys or static settings. > > I wasn't given the option to enter any static network settings. > That meant that my network didn't work, so no NIS or NFS and I > was unable to log in, nor any way of entering the details, short > of logging in as root on a console and editing the appropriate > files under /etc/sysconfig. I thought you were trying to move > away from that... Rather than having this happen during installation, it happens on the installed system using the NetworkManager applet. Right click the NetworkManager icon on the GNOME menu bar and select Edit Connections. From there you can set up all of your interfaces. If you don't want to do this, you can still create ifcfg-ethX files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts and use the old 'network' service, however the installer no longer gives you a screen to set these up. If you want to configure them during installation, you will need to perform a kickstart installation. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives: > Create a complete, general-purpose operating system I'm sorry, but an OS that doesn't let you configure the network on install, and only lets you configure it afterwards should you happen to be running a GNOME desktop (which I'm not) is in no way general purpose. And quite apart from that, even if I was running a GNOME desktop, complete with NetworkManager applet, I have an NFS mounted home directory and authenticate using NIS. So I couldn't even get to the desktop in the first place until the network was up and running. This is very definitely a bug that needs fixing. As previously stated, this is as-designed. These changes first showed up in Fedora 10, which means they've been in the works for quite a while. For your installation scenario, kickstart offers the capabilities you need. No. No, it really doesn't. But since you don't seem inclined to fix this I guess there's nothing much more I can do. Other than maybe try and find another distribution that's a bit more user friendly. Sigh. Can you explain why kickstart is not a viable option, since it provides a way to work around the issues you are having? |