Bug 510258

Summary:	tiffcp options differ in program help and manual page
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert>
Component:	libtiff	Assignee:	Jaromír Končický <jkoncick>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.0	CC:	jkoncick, mmarhefk, ovasik, phracek
Target Milestone:	beta	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	7.0
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libtiff-4.0.3-8.el7	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-06-13 11:12:56 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Miroslav Vadkerti 2009-07-08 14:04:14 UTC

Description of problem:
tiffcp's program help contains some options unexplained in manual page and some options in manual page are not present in program help. 
3 option(s) reported by the program ONLY:
	-a
	-i
	-o
5 option(s) reported by the man page ONLY:
	-1
	-B
	-C
	-L
	-M

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libtiff-3.8.2-7.el5_3.3
libtiff-3.6.1-12.el4_8.3
libtiff-3.5.7-32.el3


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. tiffcp -h
2. man tiffcp
3. compare options
  
Actual results:
There are differences between program help and manual pages.

Expected results:
No differences

Additional info:
This bug also appears in RHEL-3 and RHEL-4

Comment 1 Tom Lane 2013-03-06 03:39:25 UTC

I've fixed this upstream, so it should appear in RHEL7, but I don't think we will bother anymore to fix it in RHEL5.

Comment 2 Miroslav Vadkerti 2013-03-06 08:42:05 UTC

I think this bug could be moved to RHEL7 and should be tested by QE, reopenning.
Tom can we get a NVR of the fixed EL7 build please?

Comment 3 Miroslav Vadkerti 2013-08-12 08:28:57 UTC

Moving back to assigned. Still not fixed in current RHEL7 release libtiff-4.0.3-6.el7.

Comment 4 Miroslav Vadkerti 2013-08-12 08:33:39 UTC

I will test this bug. Testing is easy with options comparator. Cover in TCMS together with bug 510240.

Comment 5 Jaromír Končický 2013-08-12 13:34:46 UTC

CVS-COMMIT (http://bulk-mail.corp.redhat.com/archives/cvs-commits-list/2013-August/msg04294.html)

Comment 6 Miroslav Vadkerti 2013-10-01 07:27:27 UTC

Thanks for the fixes, looks like the only one left missing is:

1 option(s) reported by the program ONLY:
        -8

I do not see this explained in the **man page**.

Comment 8 Petr Hracek 2013-10-08 08:26:58 UTC

cvs-commit (http://bulk-mail.corp.redhat.com/archives/cvs-commits-list/2013-October/msg02285.html) -> MODIFIED

Comment 11 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 11:12:56 UTC

This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.