Bug 510584

Summary: Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dan Horák <dan>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jason Tibbitts <j>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: j: fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-07-14 05:59:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 509880    

Description Dan Horák 2009-07-09 20:09:21 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/openssl-ibmca.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/openssl-ibmca-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm

Description:
A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA crypto hardware on IBM zSeries machines.

Koji scratch build:
https://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83198

Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 16:13:38 UTC
I cannot seem to make any text-mode browser download the rpms from that koji link so that I can look at them.  They always fail due to certificate issues.  Do you have a trick for doing that, or could you fix the certificate issues?

Comment 3 Dan Horák 2009-07-11 16:32:41 UTC
Can you try http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83198 (s/https/http/)? The downloads work for me from elinks.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 17:21:54 UTC
Yes, that works.  Can't believe I didn't think of it myself.

rpmlint is silent and according to the build logs this builds fine.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:                  
   5a2ee2084cbf2355a4d081a89ea3cd7debd6224affab89239b2bae105bea6275
   openssl-ibmca-1.0.0.tar.bz2
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.                                                              
* description is OK.                                                          
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in koji.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   libibmca.so()(64bit)                                 
   openssl-ibmca = 1.0.0-1.fc11                         
   openssl-ibmca(s390-64) = 1.0.0-1.fc11
=
   libcrypto.so.8()(64bit)
   openssl >= 0.9.8

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

Comment 5 Dan Horák 2009-07-11 17:59:23 UTC
Thanks for the review.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: openssl-ibmca
Short Description: A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Owners: sharkcz
Branches: F-11

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 18:30:53 UTC
CVS done.

Comment 7 Dan Horák 2009-07-14 05:59:02 UTC
imported and built