Bug 510608

Summary: libogg/libvorbis -devel-docs packages broken
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Edward Sheldrake <ejsheldrake>
Component: liboggAssignee: Rakesh Pandit <rpandit>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: hdegoede, jnovy, rpandit, rransom.8774
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-10 08:52:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
.spec changes to fix devel docs none

Description Edward Sheldrake 2009-07-09 21:05:36 UTC 
Description of problem:
The libogg-devel-docs and libvorbis-devel-docs packages don't contain any developer docs, just copies of README AUTHORS COPYING again.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libogg-devel-docs-1.1.4-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
libvorbis-devel-docs-1.2.2-2.fc12.noarch.rpm

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install libogg-devel-docs and libvorbis-devel-docs
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
No developer docs are installed. Actually nothing gets installed, the same files are already in the main libogg/libvorbis packages.

Expected results:
The devel docs get installed.

Additional info:
It's since the rc1 got removed, the developer docs directory is now the same as where the main package %doc line puts its files, and %doc removes the directory first.
Comment 1 Edward Sheldrake 2009-07-18 18:22:09 UTC 
Created attachment 354259 [details]
.spec changes to fix devel docs

If libogg-devel-docs contained some docs, someone might also notice the broken link in index.html to libogg/index.html, the Makefile installs the api docs into an "ogg" subdirectory.
Comment 2 Rakesh Pandit 2009-11-10 08:52:59 UTC 
Thanks for patch .. and sorry for being NON responsive for this late.

Pushed .. and will be in tomorrow's rawhide.
Comment 3 Robert Ransom 2010-02-25 03:24:15 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for patch .. and sorry for being NON responsive for this late.
> 
> Pushed .. and will be in tomorrow's rawhide.    

This needs to be fixed in the Fedora 11 and 12 repositories.