Bug 510711
Summary: | python: drop no longer needed canonicalize.patch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tomas Hoger <thoger> |
Component: | python | Assignee: | James Antill <james.antill> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ivazqueznet, james.antill, jonathansteffan, katzj |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 169046 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2009-07-10 13:54:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tomas Hoger
2009-07-10 11:44:32 UTC
Well I'm not desperate to do it "just because" ... but if it helps 482814 get done, then I don't see why we can't drop it as part of that fix (ie. the patch for 482814 would actually be "drop canonicalize, make path bigger and do it's own fix). James, this is not about 482814. I do understand that you are probably even lot more annoyed by 482814 than I am, but this is no blocker for that but, as that one can be fixed regardless of the canonicalization patch. Yes, I came across that patch while looking at the other bug and it seemed rather useless to me, with no apparent signs of having a good chance to make it upstream. So this was meant as "hey, we seem to have an extra patch that seem to have no real benefit, that we don't seem to be able to get accepted upstream. let's have a look at the patch to see if we really want to carry it forward or can drop it safely now.". Though you're the maintainer, if forward-porting sounds like a better plan, so be it. Let me put it another way: 1. I really don't want to change anything in python we don't have to, for various reasons. 2. ...but if just rm'ing this patch makes anything else we want to do easier, I see no reason not to do it as part of that other fix. |