Bug 510784
Summary: | Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Benjamin Lewis <ben.lewis> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, herrold, mtasaka, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-01-16 14:54:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Benjamin Lewis
2009-07-10 18:41:00 UTC
I get a failure on CentOS 5 what libtool are you using? /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DVERSION=2.28.1 -I ../include -I /usr/include -O3 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT bits.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/bits.Tpo -c -o bits.lo bits.c ../libtool: line 813: X--tag=CC: command not found ../libtool: line 846: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found ../libtool: line 813: X--mode=compile: command not found ../libtool: line 979: *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.: command not found ../libtool: line 980: *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.: command not found [blewis@dominus dieharder-2.28.1]$ ./libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06) is the version on my F10 box. I don't have access to a box running CentOS 5, sadly, so am not sure how to proceed with that? This also fails to build for me in rawhide: + ./autogen.sh Running aclocal... Running autoconf... configure.ac:85: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. Running autoheader... Running automake... libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make sure libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: its definition is in aclocal's search path. I believe you are missing a build dependency. Are you building in mock? If you don't you aren't actually testing that the package builds with the set of BuildRequires: you indicate. You are welcome to build in Fedora's build system if you don't have a local mock setup. Instructions are in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join which you should probably read through in any case. I've rectified the missing libtool dependency, and the package now builds in koji for dist-f10 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466547). However, there is a curious libtool error on dist-f11 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466565), which I will look into in the morning. In the interim, an updated SRPM and spec file: SRPM: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Spec file: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec Ok, this now builds in koji on F11 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467017) and rawhide (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467026) as well. Updated SRPM and Spec: SRPM: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Spec file: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec Could this be reviewed now, please? (In reply to comment #5) > Updated SRPM and Spec: > SRPM: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-4.fc10.src.rpm > Spec file: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec > > Could this be reviewed now, please? Seems 404... Sorry about that. Must have missed then when I rebuilt my server. I will upload them to fedorapeople.org when I get home. Would you post the URL to your spec/srpm? ping again? Again ping? I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! |