Bug 511144
| Summary: | Review Request: openstreetmap - A JavaScript library for displaying the OpenStreetMap.org map data | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mathieu Bridon <bochecha> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, lemenkov, mycae, notting, tuju, valent.turkovic |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-02-13 19:25:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 508533 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Mathieu Bridon
2009-07-13 21:23:25 UTC
Adding the dependency on bug 508533, as version 2.8 of the openlayers package is needed for this one. Should the package name be something else, as project is more about the content than this particular javascript? Imo this could be named like osm-js for example. (In reply to comment #2) > Should the package name be something else, as project is more about the content > than this particular javascript? Imo this could be named like osm-js for > example. I'd prefer keeping « openstreetmap » not abbreviated, however I have nothing against adding a suffix to it to make its purpose clearer. Be it openstreetmap-api or openstreetmap-js is simply bikeshedding :) Is that a blocking item for a review ? Or can the review proceed nevertheless and I'll rename it if the reviewer thinks the name doesn't fit ? Quick 2 cents:
Openlayers is in fedora -- why is this package needed?
>I need this API for an application I'm developping
>*snip*
>Possibility 2 causes problems, as upstream might make a new release and break
>API compatibility.
How is this a fedora problem? Why would fedora want two packages of the same code from different upstreams? This seems most odd.
Openlayers and OpenStreetMap are not the same code. This openstreetmap package extends the openlayers one for accessing the OpenStreetMap.org data. So this is just another Javascript library, built on top of the OL library. For example, some of the OSM code got merged in the OL 2.8 release as it was generic code. But the rest really is an extension of OL. Maybe the two will be merged one day, I have no idea. Until then, both are different and, depending on what you do, needed. (and yes, I know OL is in Fedora, I co-maintain it :) |