Bug 511917
| Summary: | Add lshw | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Juha Tuomala <tuju> |
| Component: | lshw | Assignee: | Juha Tuomala <tuju> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | el5 | CC: | terje.rosten, tuju |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-cvs+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | B.02.12.01-1.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-08-05 17:20:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Juha Tuomala
2009-07-15 16:43:17 UTC
f10.src.rpm koji results in dist-5E-epel target: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1476599 x86_64 cli version appears to work fine. > I need lshw in EPEL, do you want to package it or should i take care of it? I don't do EPEL packages of any package at the moment. > or should i take care of it? Yes, please :-) - Terje (In reply to comment #3) > > I need lshw in EPEL, do you want to package it or should i take care of it? > > or should i take care of it? > > Yes, please :-) Okay :) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lshw New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: terjeros tuju One thing what needs to be resolved, that how can we prevent that sub-package from appearing in EPEL? I really don't think it's worth of dragging all those gui dependencies into server platform, especially when all changes in the future should be kept in minimal. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies > have a mostly stable set of packages that normally does not change > at all and only changes if there are good reasons for changes. sure the gui stuff remains as such too, but perhaps we could do some %if magic in spec for EL versions? What do you think? CVS done. lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lshw'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0105 (In reply to comment #6) > CVS done. Tibbs, btw, did you notice that cvs request was for EL-4 too? cvs done. lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |