Bug 51249

Summary:	add vacation binary to sendmail build
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Public Beta	Reporter:	Christopher McCrory <chrismcc>
Component:	sendmail	Assignee:	Florian La Roche <laroche>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	roswell	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-08-23 13:07:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Christopher McCrory 2001-08-08 19:07:59 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010725

Description of problem:
IIRC, powertools is no more

add vacation binary from sendmail build to sendmail rpm

the vacation binary was part of powertools 

maybe add it as a seperate rpm package or include it a 'obsolete' the other
one...

maybe add a symlink in /etc/smrsh

Comment 1 Florian La Roche 2001-08-23 07:28:57 UTC

if should either add a new vacation rpm to our distro, but not package it
as part of sendmail, as vacation is really independent from the MTA

Florian La Roche

Comment 2 Christopher McCrory 2001-08-23 13:07:40 UTC

I am guessing you already know this, but 8.11.6 is available

This new version fixes a security problem reported by SecurityFocus regarding
command line processing. This vulnerability is present in sendmail open source
versions between 8.10.0 and 8.11.5 as well as all 8.12.0.Beta versions.
Therefore, sendmail 8.12.0.Beta users should upgrade to 8.12.0.Beta19.

There have already been two exploits published

Comment 3 Florian La Roche 2001-08-29 09:04:25 UTC

sendmail errata is forthcoming. vacation should be a separate rpm if
we again add it.

Florian La Roche