Bug 51330

Summary:	Many messages talks about X11R6-contrib, but it is called XFree86-tools now
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Göran Uddeborg <goeran>
Component:	specspo	Assignee:	Mike A. Harris <mharris>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.3	CC:	bellison, teg
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-08-10 19:40:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Göran Uddeborg 2001-08-09 15:35:36 UTC

Many package descriptions, for example XFree86-100dpi-fonts, recently was
extended with references to the package X11R6-contrib.  But there is no
such package any more.  It's content has been moved to XFree86-tools.

(This doesn't hurt the packages in beta 3 since they have the older
description.  But since it is the most recent, I chose that for "version",
lacking any better.)

Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-08-09 16:23:39 UTC

Mike or Beth, could one of you fix this quickly so I can update what the
translators get?

Comment 2 Glen Foster 2001-08-09 20:00:54 UTC

This defect is considered MUST-FIX for Fairfax.

Comment 3 Beth Ellison 2001-08-09 20:27:11 UTC

fixed--thanks.

Comment 4 Göran Uddeborg 2001-08-10 19:21:00 UTC

A little bit too much change.  In the description of the package XFree86-tools
there was a sentence

   This package contains all applications that used to be in X11R6-contrib in
older releases.

That particular instance should not have been changed into XFree86-tools. :-)

Comment 5 Beth Ellison 2001-08-10 19:32:18 UTC

I just updated my C.po file and the XFree86-tools description does indeed have
X11R6-contrib in the sentence you point out.

???

Comment 6 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-08-10 19:40:51 UTC

Because I had fixed just before you checked it out :)