Bug 513498

Thanks for your bug report, but where is the strace?

If you have problems, please look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces

Created attachment 355213 [details]
strace of ristretto in KDE

strace

Sorry, I thought I had uploaded it last time. The file should be 40.9 MB after decompression

Sorry, but the strace is not that useful, especially when you have to dig though 40 M of text. Can you please give me a proper gdb stracktrace with the correct debuginfo installed? If you are running into problems, take a look at the wiki page I mentioned in comment #1.

Task : open a folder of animated gif wall papers (without play)

______________________________________________
$ gdb ristretto
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11)
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".                        
(gdb) run                                                                    
Starting program: /usr/bin/ristretto                                         
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]                                
** (ristretto:17118): DEBUG: xfdesktop is not running                        
[New Thread 0x7fffefd77910 (LWP 17121)]                                      
[New Thread 0x7fffef376910 (LWP 17123)]                                      
[Thread 0x7fffefd77910 (LWP 17121) exited]                                   
[New Thread 0x7fffefd77910 (LWP 17125)]                                      
[Thread 0x7fffefd77910 (LWP 17125) exited]                                   

(ristretto:17118): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom_for_display: assertion `atom != GDK_NONE' failed

(ristretto:17118): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_copy: assertion `GDK_IS_PIXBUF (pixbuf)' failed

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000035be60613e in IA__gdk_pixbuf_copy (pixbuf=0x96ced0) at gdk-pixbuf.c:294
294             g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_PIXBUF (pixbuf), NULL);
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00000035be60613e in IA__gdk_pixbuf_copy (pixbuf=0x96ced0) at gdk-pixbuf.c:294
#1  0x000000000040f21a in cb_rstto_navigator_entry_update_image (entry=0xa5e660) at navigator.c:1372
#2  0x00000035bce381cb in g_timeout_dispatch (source=0x9a9d50, callback=0, user_data=0x700000008)
    at gmain.c:3260
#3  0x00000035bce37abe in g_main_dispatch (context=<value optimized out>) at gmain.c:1824
#4  IA__g_main_context_dispatch (context=<value optimized out>) at gmain.c:2377
#5  0x00000035bce3b278 in g_main_context_iterate (context=0x6552b0, block=<value optimized out>,
    dispatch=<value optimized out>, self=<value optimized out>) at gmain.c:2455
#6  0x00000035bce3b6d5 in IA__g_main_loop_run (loop=0x6a6d90) at gmain.c:2663
#7  0x00000035c03279c7 in IA__gtk_main () at gtkmain.c:1205
#8  0x0000000000408d37 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdfb8) at main.c:342

(gdb) quit
The program is running.  Quit anyway (and kill it)? (y or n)

________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________

Ristretto terminated by KDE crash handler

______________________________________________


On another occasion it did not crash, but while viewing any particular picture, earlier pictures would start flashing.

Created attachment 355485 [details]
gdb thread apply all bt

crash report attached same context, but

#gdb thread apply all bt

Thanks a lot, this looks much more useful. Bug filed upstream as
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5629

Please try the package from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1721311 and tell me if the problem still occurs.

Did you try the packages? I had to move them to 
http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/temp/ in order to rescue them from being deleted. Please test them.

Does not seem to happen on F12 X86-64 with the packages.

I had to force the install because of conflict with a similar version of ristretto

(In reply to comment #11)
> Does not seem to happen on F12 X86-64 with the packages.

What packages? The one from the repo or the one from fedorapeople.org?

> I had to force the install because of conflict with a similar version of
> ristretto

There is no similar Version on Fedora 12, only 0.0.22-2.fc12, but not 0.0.22-2.fc12.1. These are to be found at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730423

I forced the install of 0.0.22-2.fc12.1 over 0.0.22-2.fc12

Checked with 0.0.22-2.fc12.1 on two folders with many jpgs.

(In reply to comment #13)
> I forced the install of 0.0.22-2.fc12.1 over 0.0.22-2.fc12

0.0.22-2.fc12.1 is greater than 0.0.22-2.fc12, so no need to force anything. Are you sure you used rpm -U rather than rpm -i?

> Checked with 0.0.22-2.fc12.1 on two folders with many jpgs.  

Do you still have the possibility to test on F11?

Yes I used rpm -Uvh initially and then 
rpm --force -i 

My F11 install is a stable one

Ok, then please make sure you only have one version of ristretto installed and try to reproduce the error on F11. TIA.

Any chance to
- try to reproduce the bug on F11
- test the updated packages from comment #10?

As I cannot reproduce this bug and don't get the required feedback, I'm going to close this report now. Feel free to reopen if it bites you again.

Thanks for your report.