Bug 513779
Summary: | Review Request: python-simplesettings - Simple settings initialization for Python libraries | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fabian Affolter <mail> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mads, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-11-14 14:55:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Fabian Affolter
2009-07-25 18:16:42 UTC
Neither summary of description or upstream web site or any documentation or comments in the source could help me understand what the module in this package does. Reading the code reveals that it is about returning the dict of one python module optionally overruled by another. It seems like the intention is that it can be used for simple configuration systems where the defaults can be overridden by local settings made in a py file. The library is very small - only 26 lines of code but exposes a complex and very specific API. For most practically purposes I would say that the same functionality can be achieved in simpler and better ways. I don't see why anybody should use this library. If they do then they would probably include a copy in their source and extend and customize it to their needs. I don't think having this as a Fedora package is a good idea. Fabian, I don't necessarily agree with what Mads has written above, but I (and I expect many of the other reviewers) would like to see some response to it, if for nothing else than to know that you still wish to submit this. I guess I'll close this soon if there's no response. At the moment I'm a bit short on time because of that I don't want to go on with this request for now. The source was deleted at Google Code. |