Bug 516311
Summary: | Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, lemenkov, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | linux-firmware-20100106-4.fc13.noarch | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-11-18 01:51:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 182235 |
Description
Hicham HAOUARI
2009-08-08 00:29:24 UTC
Could you point out where you find the license described? I don't see it in the tarball, nor at the upstream web site. I think I confused it with the license for the package : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 , thinking that both have the same license. I sent a mail to the firmwares vendor asking them for a clear license. Without any indication of the license I don't believe that this can be reviewed. I'll block FE-Legal, but there's not much they can do either without someone indicating the actual license on these files. closing it as wontfix since i didn't get any reponse from Ikanos It seems that these blobs were finally added into linux firmware tarball. |