Bug 516494
Summary: | Playing video causes extremely high CPU usage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Cesko Voeten <cvoeten> | ||||
Component: | xorg-x11-drv-intel | Assignee: | Adam Jackson <ajax> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 11 | CC: | ajax, bnocera, mcepl, xgl-maint | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-10-08 16:51:21 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Cesko Voeten
2009-08-10 08:28:31 UTC
My guess is that there's no Xv acceleration on your system. What's the output of "xvinfo" on your system? Is it only certain file types or a certain file that causes problems? xvinfo output: X-Video Extension version 2.2 screen #0 no adaptors present (strange.... is this a driver issue?) I tried a few files (mostly avi but also mpg and wmv), and they were all affected. This is definitely a driver issue, or a configuration issue. Your video is completely unaccelerated. Attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /etc/X11/xorg.conf to this bug. FYI, this is what it looks like on a working card: X-Video Extension version 2.2 screen #0 Adaptor #0: "Intel(R) Textured Video" number of ports: 16 port base: 71 operations supported: PutImage supported visuals: depth 24, visualID 0x21 [...] Created attachment 364001 [details]
Xorg.0.log
xorg.conf didn't exist (sorry for not mentioning this in my previous comment, I *thought* I had mentioned it in that comment but I now see I didn't) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 502913 *** |