Bug 516779

Summary: Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Ivana Varekova <varekova>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting, varekova
Target Milestone: ---Flags: varekova: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 516790 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-08-17 13:39:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 516782, 516790    
Attachments:
Description Flags
proposed .spec file none

Description Jan Safranek 2009-08-11 13:54:58 UTC 
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/libcpuset/libbitmask.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/libcpuset/libbitmask-2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: Simple multi-word bitmask library, required by libcpuset
Comment 1 Jan Safranek 2009-08-11 13:58:59 UTC 
libcpuset is reviewed as bug #516782
Comment 2 Ivana Varekova 2009-08-12 06:47:44 UTC 
1/ please change BuildRoot: 
to
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
(recommended one in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines)
2/ AUTHORS -file could be add to documentation

that`s all.
Comment 3 Jan Safranek 2009-08-12 07:43:53 UTC 
1, 2, 3: done

I uploaded new .spec and .srpm to aforementioned location.
Comment 4 Ivana Varekova 2009-08-12 07:58:42 UTC 
Looks ok now.
Comment 5 Ivana Varekova 2010-08-17 12:41:44 UTC 
Are you folks interested in continuing?
This would be closed if there will be no response soon.
Comment 6 Jan Safranek 2010-08-17 13:36:17 UTC 
Created attachment 439111 [details]
proposed .spec file

I am not interested in libbitmask in Fedora anymore, feel free to close the review. I'm attaching current .spec file in case someone wants to continue with review (and maintain the package afterwards).