Bug 516874
Summary: | Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | chitlesh:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 9.0-2.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-01 18:05:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Shakthi Kannan
2009-08-11 18:31:56 UTC
*** Bug 516878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I would appreciate if you could look at the %docs and remove useless files as appropriate. Do not forget that every time you post a SRPM rpmlint should be clean on every single rpm produced. Among, "AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL NEWS README", which ones do you want to retain? Keep those whose contents are useful to be considered as docs :) I have now kept only README and ChangeLog in the %doc section. SPEC URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eqntott.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eqntott-9.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for dist-f10, dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610099 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610109 - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package doesn't include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Approved --------- Tested contents of file ex.eqn: ------- F1 = !A|B|C; F2 = !A&C; F3 = A&B|!C; ------- $ eqntott -l ex.eqn .i 3 .o 3 .na ex .ilb A B C .ob F1 F2 F3 .p 6 0-- 1 0 0 --0 0 0 1 0-1 0 1 0 --1 1 0 0 -1- 1 0 0 11- 0 0 1 .e ----------------------------------- Package eqntott Approved Shakthi can you please review this small package for me please ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eqntott Short Description: Generates truth tables from Boolean equations Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eqntott.spec > SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eqntott-9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm > Description: Converts Boolean logic expressions into a truth table that is > useful for preparing input to espresso package for logic minimization, > converting logic expressions into simpler forms, and for creating truth tables. > > Successful Koji builds for FC10, FC11: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599131 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599155 Successful Koji build for EL-5; http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1643030 CVS done. eqntott-9.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eqntott-9.0-2.fc11 eqntott-9.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eqntott-9.0-2.fc10 eqntott-9.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eqntott-9.0-2.el5 eqntott-9.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. eqntott-9.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. eqntott-9.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |