Bug 517706
Summary: | Please rebuild it with openal-soft | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Thomas Kowaliczek <linuxdonald> |
Component: | rss-glx | Assignee: | Nils Philippsen <nphilipp> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | hdegoede, nphilipp |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-08-17 15:15:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Thomas Kowaliczek
2009-08-16 08:41:39 UTC
As discussed in bug 515109, openal using packages should only be rebuild using openal-soft-devel instead of openal-devel for F-12. Thomas, I know your English isn't the best, but please try to understand, were not going to blindly rebuild all openal using packages for F-11 and F-10. Instead the F-10 and F-11 openal-soft should NOT have the Obsoletes for regular openal (and a conflicts for openal-devel), like the initial versions for F-12 used to have. So please remove (unpush) the current openal-soft from F-10 / F-11 updates testing and do a new version without the Obosoletes / Provides for regular openal (and with a conflicts for openal-devel instead). Thank You! Regards, Hans p.s. As a demonstration of why it is a bad idea to switch to openal-soft for F-11 and F-10 see bug 517721 I'm building version 0.9.0.p right now on F-10, F-11 and Rawhide. It requires freealut-devel and will be linked against whatever this package drags in. |