Bug 518275
Summary: | RFE: [LTC 6.0 FEAT] libvirt control of ksm [202017] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | aliguori, berrange, hbrock, jjarvis, xen-maint |
Target Milestone: | beta | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | 6.1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-10-27 16:55:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 538808, 580566 |
Description
IBM Bug Proxy
2009-08-19 17:21:09 UTC
The Fedora 12 KVM rpm includes a script for automatically tuning KSM parameters on the fly. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-September/msg00052.html Need to evaluate what level of additional manual control might be needed in libvirt itself, if any. Right now there is no specific KSM libvirt support upstream, though there have been some discussions of memory overcommit control. But there is nothing available upstream at this point so the feature is at risk for RHEL 6.0 GA Daniel We are not sure KSM management belongs in libvirt at all. In any case, it is clear that it needs to settle a while longer before we can understand what kind of API it should have. Deferred this to 6.1 -- we have not yet defined where the correct interface point is for gray-area services like KSM. Once we have done that it will be obvious whether it should have a libvirt API or the API should fall to some other service. Removing from 6.0 tracker, adding to 6.1 tracker ------- Comment From aliguori.com 2010-10-27 12:43 EDT------- Given the current interfaces provided by KSM, we no longer feel it's necessary to have a libvirt interface to manage KSM. Okidoc, thanks ! Daniel ------- Comment From mcintire.com 2011-03-04 10:24 EDT------- IBM is quiting this feature request. |