Bug 518415
Summary: | Change geode arch from i586 to i686 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
Component: | yum | Assignee: | Seth Vidal <skvidal> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dcantrell, ffesti, james.antill, maxamillion, pmatilai, sebastian, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-09 20:04:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 517475 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 507678 |
Description
Peter Robinson
2009-08-20 10:32:46 UTC
I sent a patch to yum upstream, however we're discussing whether this needs to be in upstream yum, or in Fedora's build of yum (ditto the rpm change that goes with it) (In reply to comment #1) > I sent a patch to yum upstream, however we're discussing whether this needs to > be in upstream yum, or in Fedora's build of yum (ditto the rpm change that goes > with it) What's the status of this? Can we get it into the Fedora yum build while the decision is being made about upstream inclusion. We're losing valuable testing time as we steam towards the F12 release. Is there a status on this? What's the status on this. Its stopping quite a bit of testing of i686 on the geode arch in the lead up to the Beta. I think at this point we need to carry it as a patch in Fedora's yum. Seth, can you make that happen? yep. yum-3.2.24-3.fc12 is in koji now. |