Bug 519135
| Summary: | Review Request: scribus-stable - DeskTop Publishing application written in Qt | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, gwync, notting, pingou |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-06-23 13:56:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Dan Horák
2009-08-25 10:18:44 UTC
updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/reviews/scribus-stable.spec updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/reviews/scribus-stable-1.3.3.14-1.fc13.src.rpm changes: - update to new upstream release 1.3.3.14 I see a scribus in the repo coming from the same URL with exactly the same description and summary. I believe this request can be closed. Scribus is developed in 3 branches (stable, unstable and development) and these branches are being supported/developed in parallel for years. The scribus package contains the unstable branch that contains new features, but is not recommended for production-grade work. I was explicitly asked by upstream to include also the stable branch (this package). It seems completely obvious to me that what's in the regular "scribus" package should be the stable version. If you want to package an unstable version, fine, stick that in a separate package. There is a long story about Scribus in Fedora stored in bugzilla that I have inherited. Using the latest version in the 1.3.x series (now 1.3.8) is completely valid option. And because I have no user request to include the stable 1.3.3.y package and the 1.3.x will be called the new stable in foreseeable future this review request can be almost ignored ... Btw the naming scribus-stable vs. scribus was discussed and agreed with upstream. So what do you think? I see 1.3.9 in F15, and 1.3.3.14 is to be the last 1.3.3.x. I'd say close this. Right, closing. The next stable version 1.4 is in rc5, so it shouldn't take long before final release. I will then update all branches with it. |