Bug 520712
| Summary: | Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jurijs Kolomijecs <admin> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Dominic Hopf <dmaphy> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 11 | CC: | admin, dmaphy, fedora-package-review, mail, martin.gieseking, notting, paul |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-09-03 05:26:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jurijs Kolomijecs
2009-09-01 21:27:16 UTC
The package requires libmad which is not part of the Fedora because of patent reasons. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_doesn.27t_Fedora_include_support_for_proprietary_formats_like_MP3_or_MPEG.3F Thus, deadbeef couldn't be added to Fedora either. However, libmad is available through rpmfusion.org and you can probably get your package added to their repositories. Concerning BuildRequires/Requires, you can find more information about finding the necessary dependencies here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines This page is also a good introduction to other formal requirements for Fedora packages. Martin, thanks for your prompt reply on this issue. In fact you were faster with your reply than me with reviewing. Regarding your hint I assume it is not necessary anymore to review this and I can close this issue? Thank you for reviewing package. Looks like yes, you may close this issue. Have a luck! (In reply to comment #2) > Regarding your hint I assume it is not > necessary anymore to review this and I can close this issue? Yes, I think so too. Maybe it could be possible to remove the MP3 support but then the player wouldn't be of much use. It's probably better to go with rpmfusion. xmms doesn't ship with mp3 support and that's been a long time staple... |