Bug 521261
Summary: | llvm: please build with --disable-assertions | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Component: | llvm | Assignee: | Bryan O'Sullivan <bos> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bos, jgarzik, michel |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-08 16:24:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 521166 |
Description
Rex Dieter
2009-09-04 15:03:50 UTC
Fixed in llvm-2.5-6 (and newer), thanks. Darn, OpenGTL builds only with 2.5, not 2.6 (api change?), but that's something we'll have to deal with sooner or later. More OpenGTL comment (wrt my asking about llvm-2.6): (which you may or may not be aware of... but...): [12:21] <rdieter> CyrilleB: another silly OpenGTL/llvm question from me. fedora's development branch just switched to llvm-2.6pre, but OpenGTL won't build with it. Is that something easily fixed or soon to be fixed? <CyrilleB> rdieter: :( it's clearly not easily fixed, and won't be fixed until 2.6 is out [12:26] <CyrilleB> rdieter: llvm doesn't maintain API compatibility between release, I don't know how many packages you have in fedora that depends on it at the moment, but I would suggest that you mention that issue to llvm packagers Thanks for mentioning that. We don't have any for the moment that has API issues -- Pure is being packaged, but its maintainer is making sure it builds with 2.5, 2.6 and the current trunk (that will be 2.7). Should we keep F-11 at 2.5 for a bit longer? I can push 2.5-6 to F-10 and F-11, now that -5 has made it to -stable. Though I might first spend some time backporting the 2.6 build script patches, so we don't have the buildroot embedded in the library files. Unfortunately, my primary target for OpenGTL is F-12 (for koffice2), but I can understand other pressures, and can wait until llvm-2.6 (final) lands and OpenGTL gets fixed for it. Ah. well, would it be possible to get OpenGTL in for F-11 (and maybe F-10) first, and then when 0.9.11 comes out you can just build for F-12 also? That will shake out any oddities and let the package review not stall for too long. The timing is a bit unfortunate -- LLVM 2.6's release schedule is a perfect fit for F-12, though if OpenGTL and more packages like it are already in our repositories, the decision would have been different (and we would be shouting at upstream, both LLVM and dependent projects, to coordinate better among themselves!) |