Bug 521893
| Summary: | clang broken on x86_64 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Winship <danw> |
| Component: | llvm | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | bos, jgarzik, michel |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-09-10 04:42:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Dan Winship
2009-09-08 15:56:23 UTC
It turns out the headers are identical, so I'm patching Makefile.rules to use -p when installing data files, and reverting the sed invocation I used to install to %{_lib}.
I'm asking upstream what their package naming preference is (llvm-clang is a bit long, llvm-clang-analyzer even longer), so I'm holding back on releasing the fix for now. 2.6.0 pre2 will be out soon too. In the meantime, could you just symlink /usr/lib64/clang to /usr/lib/clang and check if everything else works?
Thanks!
yeah, i was just doing "CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/lib64/clang/1.0/include" before, and that was working fine This should be fixed in 0.5.pre1 (0.4.pre1 failed to build on ppc because of GCC's new var-tracking-assignments). clang can now be installed without pulling in LLVM -- it can generate native code, native assembly, LLVM IR assembly and LLVM bitcode by itself. I'm not polluting the spec file with Provides: and Obsoletes: since there's been only one clang release before that, so please uninstall llvm-clang first. |