Bug 523368

Summary: initscript collected problems LSB-compilant rusersd
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jan Ščotka <jscotka>
Component: rusersAssignee: Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: dfediuck, dkovalsk, jmoskovc
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rusers-0.17-58.fc13 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 567957 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-27 03:47:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 521669, 567957    

Description Jan Ščotka 2009-09-15 08:04:12 UTC
There are some problems with LSB-compilants of initscript against
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript definition.

service: rusersd

I've created some test and there is output of run (PASS menas that it started correctly, FAIL, that there is some problem with returncode, explanaition in brackets):

:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> service start
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Service must start without problem
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Then Status command 
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Already started service 
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Again status command 
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> service restart
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Restarting of service
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Status command 
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> service stop
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Stopping service 
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Status of stopped service 
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Stopping service again 
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Status of stopped service 
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> pid file
:: [   FAIL   ] :: File /var/run/rusersd.pid should exist 
:: [   PASS   ] :: Running 'echo 666666 > /var/run/rusersd.pid'
:: [   FAIL   ] ::  Existing pid file, but service not started  (Expected 1, got 3)
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> lock file
:: [   PASS   ] :: File /var/lock/subsys/rusersd should exist
:: [   PASS   ] :: Running 'touch /var/lock/subsys/rusersd'
:: [   FAIL   ] ::  Existing lock file, but service not started  (Expected 2, got 3)
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> insufficient rights
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Starting service for restarting under nonpriv user 
:: [   PASS   ] :: Insufficient rights, restarting resrvice under nonprivileged user must fail
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> operations
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Service have to implement start function 
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Service have to implement restart function 
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Service have to implement status function 
:: [   FAIL   ] ::  Service have to implement usage function  (Expected 0, got 2)
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Service have to implement condrestart function 
:: [   FAIL   ] ::  Service have to implement try-restart function  (Expected 0, got 2)
:: [   FAIL   ] ::  Service have to implement reload function  (Expected 0, got 3)
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Service have to implement force-reload function 
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> nonexist operations
:: [   PASS   ] ::  Testing proper return code when nonexisting function
:: [   LOG    ] :: >>>>>>>>> invalid arguments
:: [   PASS   ] ::  When no arguments added to service, it must fail with proper return code 

There are some problems: service doesn't create pid file and also is there bad exist status
are tbere bad exist states when lock file is there but service not working.
and also are ther some unimplement functions: usage, try-restart, reload (it should return proper code 3 (unimpelent) or should be implemented)

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 12:23:49 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2010-02-24 13:01:00 UTC
rusers-0.17-57.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rusers-0.17-57.fc12

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2010-02-24 13:05:37 UTC
rusers-0.17-58.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rusers-0.17-58.fc13

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2010-02-25 12:46:35 UTC
rusers-0.17-58.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rusers'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F13/FEDORA-2010-2857

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2010-02-27 03:47:05 UTC
rusers-0.17-57.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 02:08:12 UTC
rusers-0.17-58.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.