Bug 523915
Summary: | Ifdown one of both tap devices in guest will cause the other down as well | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Yolkfull Chow <yzhou> |
Component: | kvm | Assignee: | Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Lawrence Lim <llim> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.4 | CC: | tburke, tools-bugs, virt-maint, ykaul |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-10-29 22:46:55 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Yolkfull Chow
2009-09-17 07:46:42 UTC
What's the qemu cmdline? It is weird that the tap state was changed. Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. (In reply to comment #1) > What's the qemu cmdline? It is weird that the tap state was changed. Hi Dor, Sorry for the late reply. As referred in this bug description, the FULL command line could be found in bug #505232, and I also would paste it here: #/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -name 'vm1' -drive file=/tmp/kvm_autotest_root/images/RHEL-Server-5.3-64-virtio.qcow2,media=disk,if=virtio,cache=off,boot=on -uuid 4b66fdbe-b86d-42f3-8efd-76db26aaedb6 -net nic,vlan=0,macaddr=00:11:22:33:aa:bc,model=virtio -net tap,vlan=0,ifname=test1,script=/etc/qemu-ifup-switch,downscript=no -net nic,vlan=1,macaddr=00:cc:22:33:aa:bc,model=e1000 -net tap,vlan=1,ifname=test2,script=/etc/qemu-ifup-switch,downscript=no -net nic,vlan=2,macaddr=00:11:22:33:aa:be,model=rtl8139 -net tap,vlan=2,ifname=test3,script=/etc/qemu-ifup-switch,downscript=no -m 2048 -smp 2 -vnc :0 Seems this problem still exists but I'm not sure. Yeah it's weird and important for keep guest's network stable I think. Do you think we need to reopen it? Are you running STP on the bridge? It might be the cause. We use stp off by default. |