Bug 525432
Summary: | Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Andrew Colin Kissa <andrew> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | andrew, fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | andrew:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.1.2-1.fc12 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-11-20 05:28:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Peter Lemenkov
2009-09-24 11:42:36 UTC
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm openxcap.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 16, tab: line 4) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - The warning is not a deal breaker you can fix that. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha1sum openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz rpmbuild/SOURCES/openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz 9ed0917ae69dae7bd8eb05e8d81653cb54a0dea0 openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz 9ed0917ae69dae7bd8eb05e8d81653cb54a0dea0 rpmbuild/SOURCES/openxcap-1.1.2.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1784722 N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly N\A: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section FAIL: Each package must consistently use macros If you are using the %{__python} style macros, then you need to be consistent and use %{__install}, %{__rm} etc OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' N\A: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package N\A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 - Please fix the issues raised before requesting CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (openxcap) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, Andrew! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openxcap Short Description: Fully featured XCAP server Owners: peter Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: cvs done. openxcap-1.1.2-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.el4 openxcap-1.1.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.el5 openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 openxcap-1.1.2-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openxcap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0804 openxcap-1.1.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openxcap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0806 openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openxcap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-11280 openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |