Bug 525732
Summary: | munge bug in initscript | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Issue Tracker <tao> |
Component: | munge | Assignee: | Steve Traylen <steve.traylen> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | el5 | CC: | steve.traylen, tao |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 0.5.8-6.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-10-16 19:36:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Issue Tracker
2009-09-25 13:20:02 UTC
Event posted on 09-24-2009 08:06pm EDT by woodard
Munge is now in EPEL and centos gets it from there. Chris the upstream fixed it there. However, it is too minor a change to make a new release. We should fix the package.
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:31:33 -0700
From: Chris Dunlap <cdunlap>
Message-Id: <20090924233133.4053F14001.gov>
This is already fixed and will appear in the next release (no ETA yet).
It should be:
SERVICE_NAME="`basename "$0" .init | sed 's/^[SK][0-9][0-9]*//'`"
This should probably be reported to the distro's bug tracker so they
can issue an updated rpm. I'll see if I can find someone to do that.
-Chris
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 08:07pm +0200, Charles Vejnar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently installed Munge on a CentOS 5.3. It seems there is a
> problem with the Initscript. On line 45, SERVICE_NAME gets S40munge
> and not munge, which makes the reading of /etc/sysconfig/munge
> impossible a few lines after.
>
> Line 45:
> SERVICE_NAME="`basename "$0" .init`"
>
> Would it be possible to modify the script to make it work (I have just
> put SERVICE_NAME="munge" in my file for now) ?
>
> Thank you
>
> Charles
>
> _______________________________________________
> munge-users mailing list
> munge-users
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/munge-users
This event sent from IssueTracker by kbaxley [LLNL (HPC)]
issue 346913
munge-0.5.8-6.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/munge-0.5.8-6.el4 munge-0.5.8-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/munge-0.5.8-6.el5 munge-0.5.8-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/munge-0.5.8-6.fc10 munge-0.5.8-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/munge-0.5.8-6.fc11 munge-0.5.8-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update munge'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0535 munge-0.5.8-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. munge-0.5.8-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. munge-0.5.8-6.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. munge-0.5.8-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |