Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Thomas Janssen <thomasj>|
|Status:||CLOSED DUPLICATE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||cristian.ciupitu, fedora-package-review, kumarpraveen.nitdgp, notting, sagarun, thomasj|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2011-01-05 15:59:05 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 14:47:16 EDT
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration-0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a fairly simple user-registration application for Django_, designed to make allowing user signups as painless as possible. It requires a functional installation of Django 1.0 or newer, but has no other dependencies.
Comment 1 Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 11:04:16 EDT
The website from "Url:" has heavy problems right now. Dunno if that's a criteria to wait and get a new url for registration first (hardcoded link), or if it's easily setup after registration via a conf-file. I'm not a py coder. A koji Task Info link from a scratch build and the rpmlint output would be nice. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Comment 2 Thomas Janssen 2009-10-29 07:13:19 EDT
Ping? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Comment 3 Cristian Ciupitu 2010-04-13 20:16:12 EDT
Yet another ping.
Comment 4 Arun S A G 2011-01-05 13:33:34 EST
ping. I intend to use this package for my personal project, I'd like to see this in Fedora. If the submitter is OK i am ready to take this package.
Comment 5 Cristian Ciupitu 2011-01-05 15:48:37 EST
I need this package as well because Satchmo depends on it. I'm not a sponsor, but I'll gladly review the SPEC once it's clear who's the packager.  http://www.satchmoproject.com/
Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-05 15:59:05 EST
At this point I'd suggest that anyone else who wishes to submit this package simply do so in a new ticket and mark this one as a duplicate. This ticket should have been closed due to inactivity ages ago.