Bug 526100

Summary: Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Thomas Janssen <thomasj>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: cristian.ciupitu, fedora-package-review, kumarpraveen.nitdgp, notting, sagarun, thomasj
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-05 15:59:05 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 14:47:16 EDT
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration.spec
SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration-0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm
This is a fairly simple user-registration application for Django_,
designed to make allowing user signups as painless as possible. It
requires a functional installation of Django 1.0 or newer, but has no
other dependencies.
Comment 1 Thomas Janssen 2009-10-03 11:04:16 EDT
The website from "Url:" has heavy problems right now. Dunno if that's a criteria to wait and get a new url for registration first (hardcoded link), or if it's easily setup after registration via a conf-file. I'm not a py coder.

A koji Task Info link from a scratch build and the rpmlint output would be nice.

Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
Comment 2 Thomas Janssen 2009-10-29 07:13:19 EDT

Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
Comment 3 Cristian Ciupitu 2010-04-13 20:16:12 EDT
Yet another ping.
Comment 4 Arun S A G 2011-01-05 13:33:34 EST
ping. I intend to use this package for my personal project, I'd like to see this in Fedora. If the submitter is OK i am ready to take this package.
Comment 5 Cristian Ciupitu 2011-01-05 15:48:37 EST
I need this package as well because Satchmo[1] depends on it.
I'm not a sponsor, but I'll gladly review the SPEC once it's clear who's the packager.

[1] http://www.satchmoproject.com/
Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-05 15:59:05 EST
At this point I'd suggest that anyone else who wishes to submit this package simply do so in a new ticket and mark this one as a duplicate.  This ticket should have been closed due to inactivity ages ago.
Comment 7 Praveen Kumar 2011-08-06 08:49:30 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 728691 ***