Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Update Transifex instance to version 0.7 or greater|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora Localization||Reporter:||Ruediger Landmann <rlandman>|
|Component:||l10n-requests||Assignee:||Dimitris Glezos <dimitris>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||A S Alam <aalam>|
|Version:||unspecified||CC:||b, diegobz, eric, fedora, mshao, piotrdrag, tomasz, trans|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-03-12 11:03:11 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||436824, 516117, 518348, 520243|
Description Ruediger Landmann 2009-10-05 19:51:35 EDT
Description of problem: Fedora's current Transifex instance is version 0.5.2. This version lacks a number of features available in later versions of Transifex that are very important for the Fedora Documentation Project. Specifically, these include the ability to handle more than one PO file per language per component and the ability to recognise the BCP 47 language codes that are part of the XML specification. An infrastructure ticket is already open: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1455 but some bugs in Bugzilla now depend on this upgrade, so I'm filing this bug as a blocker. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.5.2
Comment 1 firstname.lastname@example.org 2009-11-30 10:28:21 EST
Any update on this? With the Docs Project moving into using Publican as its solution for managing the DocBook XML files this upgrade is becoming more and more necessary.
Comment 2 Diego Búrigo Zacarão 2009-11-30 11:12:37 EST
I did some comments earlier in the cited ticket above.
Comment 3 Piotr Drąg 2010-03-12 11:03:11 EST
Finally, Transifex has been updated. :) We are still behind official releases, but at least all missing features are there.