Bug 527376
| Summary: | service autofs start when the service is running does not return success | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Ian Kent <ikent> |
| Component: | autofs5 | Assignee: | Ian Kent <ikent> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | yanfu,wang <yanwang> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 4.8 | CC: | fnadge, ikent, jmoyer, yanwang |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.110 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, automount did not return its status to its parent while it waited for the autofs daemon to complete its startup. With this update, automount now returns its status and accurately reports when the service has started.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 244117 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2011-02-16 14:21:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 244117 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Comment 2
yanfu,wang
2010-12-20 07:33:22 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
Previously, automount did not return its status to its parent while it waited for the autofs daemon to complete its startup. With this update, automount now returns its status and accurately reports when the service has started.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0241.html |