Bug 528237
| Summary: | Multilib conflict in libotf-devel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Philippe Troin <phil> |
| Component: | libotf | Assignee: | Neal Becker <ndbecker2> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 12 | CC: | awilliam, ndbecker2 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-12-04 07:31:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Philippe Troin
2009-10-09 22:26:01 UTC
Try 0.9.9-2 you shouldn't close a bug in a stable release until an official update package has been shipped... -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers And it has not. F12 contains libotf-devel-0.9.9-1.fc12 which still has problems. Thus reopening. I brought this up on fedora-devel list when it was first reported. IIRC, the consensus was that this is not a bug - there is no requirement that multiple devel packages do not conflict. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-October/039282.html Any counter argument? On a 64-bit system, I can build either a 32-bit or 64-bit binary or library by using -m32 or -m64. If I cannot install both 32 and 64 bit -devel packages, I cannot any more. If this is a (new) Fedora guideline, then that's fine with me. Stupid in my opinion (as this was a big Fedora selling point for me), but fine. Then remove all -devel.i686 packages from the repositories. Or make both libotf-devel.i686 mutually exclusive. In my opinion, if you're allowed to install it, it should install, not bug out. Thanks for your time. This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |