Bug 528368

Summary: Duplicate "Provides" entries
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matt McCutchen <matt>
Component: liberation-fontsAssignee: Caius Chance <K9>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 11CC: fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, K9, petersen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-10-19 00:11:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matt McCutchen 2009-10-11 18:18:38 UTC
Description of problem:
Each of the packages liberation-mono-fonts, liberation-sans-fonts, liberation-serif-fonts contains a duplicate "provide" for its own name-version-release in addition to the one implicitly generated by rpm.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch
liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch
liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -q --provides -a 'liberation-*-fonts' | grep '^liberation'

Actual results:
liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11
liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11
liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11
liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11
liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11
liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11

Expected results:
liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11
liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11
liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11

Additional info:
It looks like this has already been fixed in rawhide in liberation-fonts-1.04.93-11, according to the spec file in CVS:

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec?r1=1.36&r2=1.37

So feel free to mark this CLOSED RAWHIDE if you don't wish to make the fix for Fedora 11.  I thought I'd ask because the duplicate provides came up when I was doing some checks on my RPM database.