Bug 528590
Summary: | IA-32 EL's patch to fix nanosleep and fadvise bug | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Xiaolan <xiaolan.huang> | ||||||||
Component: | ia32el | Assignee: | Petr Machata <pmachata> | ||||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto> | ||||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
Priority: | high | ||||||||||
Version: | 5.5 | CC: | anton.fang, ebachalo, eric.lin, gcase, jane.lv, jvillalo, jwest, keve.a.gabbert, luyu, mnewsome, mnowak, pmuller, rpacheco, tao | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||||
Target Release: | 5.5 | ||||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2010-03-30 08:27:09 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 529716, 533941 | ||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Xiaolan
2009-10-13 01:42:53 UTC
Created attachment 364537 [details]
patch for ia-32el v7
The patch to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528595 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528592 *** Bug 528595 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 528592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Event posted on 12-09-2009 01:35pm JST by moshiro Following is from Fujitsu regarding the proposed patch: --- > Intel reports that they have fixed the clock_nanosleep() and fadvise64() syscall bugs. They created a new Bugzilla entry to track the patch: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528590 We checked the patch attached at Bug #528590. It fixes fadvise64() but does _not_ fix fadvise64_64(). We are afraid Intel forgot fadvise64_64(). --- Could you please verify it and reply to this comment? Best Regards, M Oshiro This event sent from IssueTracker by moshiro issue 346929 Created attachment 377642 [details]
patch to fix fadvise64_64
The patch to fix fadvise64_64 was uploaded. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards, Xiaolan Oshiro-san, can you attach testcases for this two bugs so we can test fixes in house, please? From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528595 it seems that one of the test cases (fadvise64_64()) might sit in IssueTracker. Michal, I attached the fadvise reproducer to the bug 528595. I'm leaving the needinfo in, since we still need the test case for nanosleep. Created attachment 386518 [details]
reproducer for nanosleep
This is a reproducer for nanosleep.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0250.html |