Bug 532190

Latest version of MojoMojo requires newer version of Text::MultiMarkdown
(currently provided by perl-Text-Markdown). To complicate matters, upstream has
split Text::Markdown and Text::MultiMarkdown into separate packages.

Patch to update existing perl-Text-Markdown is at bug #532191

This won't build in mock until perl-Text-Markdown has been updated.

Scratch build is now available:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851066

Oh, and a new srpm with .fc13 tag:

http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown-1.000031-1.fc13.src.rpm

Taking.

 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: dist-f13
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1928071
 [x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type: BSD
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
43cf7ff201336234ed042c0f60bc4fe0  Text-MultiMarkdown-1.000031.tar.gz
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
                                                                                 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1928071
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
     Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1928071
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [x] %check is present and the tests pass
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/24fulldocs-pythonmarkdown2-tm.t       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 41 Failed: 0)
  TODO passed:   2-3, 6-8, 10-12, 15-16, 21-24, 30, 32-38
                41
t/29fulldocs-maruku-unittest.t          (Wstat: 0 Tests: 60 Failed: 0)
  TODO passed:   4, 11-12, 21, 31, 33, 39, 48-51, 56, 58-59
Files=26, Tests=224,  3 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr  0.04 sys +  2.72 cusr  0.18 csys =  3.11 CPU)
Result: PASS

Provides:
  perl(Text::MultiMarkdown) = 1.000031

Requires:
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
  perl >= 0:5.008_000
  perl(Carp)
  perl(Digest::MD5)
  perl(Encode)
  perl(base)
  perl(re)
  perl(strict)
  perl(warnings)

APPROVED.

Again, thanks for the review.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown
Short Description: Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML
Owners: iarnell
Branches: devel
InitialCC: perl-sig

I had a slight change of heart - there should be an F-12 branch for this.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown
Short Description: Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML
Owners: iarnell
Branches: F-12
InitialCC: perl-sig

CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

(Fedora Maintainer agreed via e-mail)

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown
Short Description: Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML
Owners: lkundrak
Branches: EL-5

Oh no I didn't!

Iain, oh, please accept my apologies. I confused this with perl-Text-Markdown.