Bug 532524

Summary: Review request: jcifs - Common Internet File System Client in 100% Java
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting, sochotni
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-19 10:42:46 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-02 13:00:54 EST
Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jcifs.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jcifs-1.3.12-1.fc12.src.rpm
The jCIFS SMB client library enables any Java application to remotely
access shared files and directories on SMB file servers(i.e. a Microsoft
Windows "share") in addition to domain, workgroup, and server
enumeration of NetBIOS over TCP/IP networks. It is an advanced
implementation of the CIFS protocol supporting Unicode, batching,
multiplexing of threaded callers, encrypted authentication,
transactions, the Remote Access Protocol (RAP), and much more. It is
licensed under LGPL which means commercial organizations can
legitimately use it with their proprietary code(you just can't sell or
give away a modified binary only version of the library itself without

This package was imported from JPackage
Comment 1 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-06-08 10:30:39 EDT
I'll do the review, but would you mind updating to latest version first? As far as I can see, upstream keeps only latest version of sources available for each main version. It might be a good idea to contact them about it. It makes verifying sources quite hard.
Comment 2 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-11-19 10:42:46 EST
I am closing this since there seems to be no interest to continue the review at this time. If that changes, feel free to reopen.