Bug 532526
Summary: | Review request: jrexx - Automaton based regular expression API for Java | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-11-06 01:17:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Mary Ellen Foster
2009-11-02 18:01:03 UTC
Is this an attempt to bring the jrexx package back into Fedora? It's dead.package'd in devel but it's present in F-11. There seem to be some interesting differences between your submission and what's currently in the shipping distros. At least the scriptlets and the installation of the pom files come to mind. For the sake of any reviewers you may get, you should at least comment on the fact that the package is already in the distro in a different form and describe any differences between your package and what they'll see if they check it out from our CVS. It's been over a year since I posed that question and there was never any response. I'm just going to close this. |