Bug 532918

Summary: [abrt] crash detected in avant-window-navigator-0.3.2-7.fc12
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: adriano <adrigiga>
Component: avant-window-navigatorAssignee: leigh scott <leigh123linux>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: jason.goodman, leigh123linux, mhchagas, ngompa13, sindrepb
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:802e305efe1366fa000ded7bf2a8756eaceab50a
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-11 16:02:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description adriano 2009-11-04 10:46:35 UTC 
abrt detected a crash.


How to reproduce
-----
1.
2.
3.


Additional information
======


Attached files
----
backtrace

cmdline
-----
avant-window-navigator 


component
-----
avant-window-navigator


executable
-----
/usr/bin/avant-window-navigator


kernel
-----
2.6.31.5-96.fc12.i686


package
-----
avant-window-navigator-0.3.2-7.fc12


reason
-----
Process was terminated by signal 6
Comment 1 adriano 2009-11-04 10:46:38 UTC 
Created attachment 367438 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 15:03:49 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-02-24 17:29:45 UTC 
*** Bug 561157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 leigh scott 2010-03-08 15:07:34 UTC 
Does the new version fix it?
Comment 5 adriano 2010-03-11 15:41:35 UTC 
Yes, fixed.
Thanks
Comment 6 leigh scott 2010-03-11 16:02:53 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Yes, fixed.
> Thanks    

Thank you for replying.