Bug 532922
| Summary: | Security features for SNMP APC, IBM Bladecenter | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Marek Grac <mgrac> | |
| Component: | cman | Assignee: | Marek Grac <mgrac> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | low | |||
| Version: | 5.4 | CC: | cluster-maint, djansa, edamato, jkortus | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | All | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | cman-2.0.015-25-el5 | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 573834 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-03-30 08:41:39 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | 573834, 574027, 574059 | |||
| Bug Blocks: | ||||
|
Description
Marek Grac
2009-11-04 11:07:25 UTC
fence_ibmblade: http://git.fedoraproject.org/git/cluster.git?p=cluster.git;a=commit;h=964daeeb59eb1458c792af0ba2088d06367147f4 fence_apc_snmp: http://git.fedoraproject.org/git/cluster.git?p=cluster.git;a=commit;h=5cf593269f8731855274a2fb593e07b0f2ede20d [root@z1 sbin]# fence_apc_snmp -a 1.1.1.1 -l x -p x -n 4 Timed out waiting to power ON Success: Rebooted [root@z1 sbin]# echo $? 0 Is this behaviour as intended? I tried it also against 127.0.0.1 an the result is identical. Does this really check that the node was powered off (i.e. fenced) which is very key part of fencing? An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0266.html |