Bug 533026

Summary:	installing unsigned rpm file fails
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Oliver Henshaw <oliver.henshaw>
Component:	kpackagekit	Assignee:	Steven M. Parrish <smparrish>
Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	balajig81, kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, richard, smparrish
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-11-14 15:33:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Oliver Henshaw 2009-11-04 18:10:58 UTC

Description of problem:

I tried to install a yum repo (rpmfusion-free) from an rpm. This fails immediately after kpackagekit asks me to confirm the transaction (which is after kpackagekit simulates the transaction).

kpackagekit presents me with a small window titled "Failed to install file - kpackagekit" with the contents "An unknown error happened."

I had this problem with the rpmfusion-free rpm from http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration - it makes no difference whether I open it in konqueror or download and run kpackagekit on the rpm from dolphin.

I also tried yumdownloader'ing a file from rawhide and installing it from dolphin. This fails in the same way.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

PackageKit-0.5.4-0.1.20091029git.fc12.i686
kpackagekit-0.5.0.3-1.fc12.i686

Comment 1 Steven M. Parrish 2009-11-10 16:48:35 UTC

Please report this upstream at http://bugs.kde.org

We will monitor upstream for a fix.

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 2 Oliver Henshaw 2009-11-14 15:22:50 UTC

nm

Comment 3 Oliver Henshaw 2009-11-14 18:42:38 UTC

I'm not sure whether I botched clearing the needinfo flag, but shouldn't this actually be Closed -> Upstream?