Bug 533737

Summary: Recommend changing the Feedback statement to include the component name.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: eric
Component: publican-fedoraAssignee: Ruediger Landmann <rlandman>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: docs, jfearn, mmcallis, nb, rlandman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-21 14:26:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposed patch for Feedback.xml eric: review?

Description eric 2009-11-08 20:25:39 UTC
Created attachment 368073 [details]
Proposed patch for Feedback.xml

Description of problem: Instead of telling people "When submitting a bug report, be sure to mention the manual's identifier: &BOOKID". It might be better to point them toward the specific component in BZ which just happens to be the same as the &BOOKID (or it should).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0-0.fc12

Comment 1 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2009-11-27 10:34:34 UTC
The only issue I can see with this is that anyone using the Fedora brand who doesn't have a component would have incorrect instructions.

This entity isn't used anywhere in the code, so it's purely a cosmetic decision.

Cheers, Jeff.

Comment 2 eric 2009-11-27 14:12:25 UTC
That's a good point.  Although to get a component in Fedora Documentation's BZ product is fairly easy, just ask me for one and I make it happen.

Comment 3 Ruediger Landmann 2010-01-21 14:26:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Although to get a component in Fedora Documentation's BZ
> product is fairly easy, just ask me for one and I make it happen.    

Yeah; and if a document doesn't have a Bugzilla component, maybe it shouldn't point readers to Bugzilla for feedback?

However, I'm more concerned about this on a pragmatic level, because changing this will require attention from a lot of ranslators -- we have this file complete in around 40 languages!

On that basis alone, I'm closing this DEFERRED for now, but will revisit it when we next need L10N to look at Publican's common content (which will be sometime after the Transifex upgrade).

Cheers

Rudi