Bug 533753
| Summary: | Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ian Weller <ian> | ||||
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Thomas Spura <tomspur> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mrunge, notting, tomspur | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | tomspur:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-12-01 04:14:11 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Ian Weller
2009-11-08 23:41:26 UTC
Package Review
==============
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
Using just 'pep8' and not 'python-pep8' won't makes sense.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture.
Tested on:
[] devel/i386
[] devel/x86_64
[] F11/i386
[x] F11/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-pep8.spec python-pep8-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm noarch/python-pep8-0.4.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: Expat or MIT -> MIT
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
Upstream source: da8562ef0b18ae9ced210cff742a2d1b
Build source: da8562ef0b18ae9ced210cff742a2d1b
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Missing BR: python-setuptools
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[!] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures.
Missing BR.
With python-setuptools:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1797324
[x] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with).
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
Issues:
- Missing BR: python-setuptools
Anything else is fine.
________________________________
APPROVED
I'll be attaching a diff of the spec in a sec for transparency. Consists of a release bump, adding the necessary BR, and fixing a syntax error in the %changelog. Also, I just noticed the upstream URL was incorrect for that particular package from pypi, so that was adjusted. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pep8 Short Description: Python style guide checker Owners: ianweller Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: Created attachment 368301 [details]
diff of approved spec and the spec I plan to check in
cvs done. thanks, kevin. python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc11 python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc12 python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-pep8 New Branches: epel7 Owners: ianweller mrunge Git done (by process-git-requests). |