Bug 535379 (RHQ-2081)

Summary: Describe hardware sizing requirements for new installs
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: John Mazzitelli <mazz>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Deon Ballard <dlackey>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature, Task
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2081
Fixed In Version: 1.4 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-12 16:10:40 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description John Mazzitelli 2009-05-12 09:11:00 EDT
need some rough minimum sizing guidelines for a box that is running a server

It would be good to have a table of "if you're going to monitor N resources and collect M metrics, you need a box like this".
Comment 1 Corey Welton 2009-08-26 14:58:31 EDT
Pushed to 1.4
Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla 2009-11-10 15:57:23 EST
This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2081
Comment 3 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 10:44:58 EST
mass move off the qa triage list.  These are tasks for dev.
Comment 4 Deon Ballard 2010-03-15 11:53:02 EDT
Stealing these doc bugs.
Comment 5 Deon Ballard 2010-03-15 13:06:14 EDT
Blocking install guide tracker.
Comment 6 Deon Ballard 2010-08-02 11:56:09 EDT
Changing status to ON_QA since the 2.4 release is out of the door.
Comment 7 Deon Ballard 2013-12-12 16:10:40 EST
The install guide contains these links for hardware and db minimums:


These aren't super extensive, but it is the limit of commitment from support and PM, given the plethora of different infrastructures and management scenarios.

Somewhat related, there is also a new performance chapter in the server/agents guide: