Bug 535572 (RHQ-2253)

Summary:	remove http(s) options from rhq.agent.server.transport in rhq-plugin.xml
Product:	[Other] RHQ Project	Reporter:	Corey Welton <cwelton>
Component:	No Component	Assignee:	John Mazzitelli <mazz>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Mike Foley <mfoley>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	1.3pre	Keywords:	SubBug
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
URL:	http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2253
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-09-02 07:27:36 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	565628

Description Corey Welton 2009-07-21 18:09:00 UTC

Per RHQ-2009, similar to removing http/https from "rhq.communications.connector.transport", we should perhaps do the same for "rhq.agent.server.transport".

[13:26] <cswiii> ping, re: http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2009 -- out of curiosity, is it valid for 
                 'rhq.agent.server.transport' to have http(s)?
[13:29] <mazz> technically, we can use that, but people will probably never use it. (ssl)socket or (ssl)servlet are probalby 
               the ones we really need
[13:29] <mazz> we probably could remove those http(s).. I'm not sure if we really need those

Repro steps:
1. Unpack agent plugin jar
2. navigate to rhq-plugin.xml 
3. Search for rhq.communications.connector.transport
4. Observe results.

Comment 1 Red Hat Bugzilla 2009-11-10 21:00:52 UTC

This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-2253

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:59:07 UTC

Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug

Comment 3 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 17:03:52 UTC

making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage

Comment 4 John Mazzitelli 2011-03-24 13:05:34 UTC

as per:

http://rhq-project.org/display/JOPR2/Communications+Configuration
http://rhq-project.org/display/JOPR2/Securing+Communications

the protocols that would only be used/supported is (ssl)servlet and (ssl)socket.

commit af9ff8b removes http and https from the list of options

Comment 5 Mike Foley 2011-06-09 20:10:25 UTC

visual inspection of rhq-plugins.xml

Comment 6 Heiko W. Rupp 2013-09-02 07:27:36 UTC

Bulk closing of issues that were VERIFIED, had no target release and where the status changed more than a year ago.